This text accommodates spoilers for “28 Years Later.”
When the primary trailer for “28 Years Later” dropped — , the one with the haunting rendition of Rudyard Kipling’s poem “Boots” by Taylor Holmes — there was a lot hypothesis concerning the trailer’s evocative imagery and what it would imply for the movie itself. Given the truth that “28 Years Later” is a movie arriving 23 years after the unique film within the collection, “28 Days Later,” and 18 years after the primary sequel, “28 Weeks Later,” in 2007, there was already a lot to theorize about. Maybe the largest rumors surrounded a very gaunt-looking Contaminated creature glimpsed within the trailer, one who bears a passing resemblance (as a lot as a clearly zombie-like factor can) to actor Cillian Murphy, who performed the heroic survivor Jim in “28 Days Later.” Apprehensive followers gossiped over the chance, a lot in order that the actor who really does painting the creature, Angus Neill, took to the press to dispel the rumor.
The “Contaminated Jim” concept appears to be a easy byproduct of followers coming down with a case of franchise mind and seeing connections that have been by no means supposed to be there. And but, after viewing the precise full movie, it appears like director Danny Boyle and author Alex Garland are certainly taking part in a figuring out recreation of spot the Easter egg on the subject of this sequel, particularly the place the character of Jim is anxious. Threaded all through “28 Years Later,” there are little bits and items that obliquely recall Murphy’s Jim, and Neill’s Contaminated man might be thought of part of this thread. All of it culminates in a reveal throughout the film’s cliffhanger ending, which not solely pulls a quick one on horror followers however appears to point that Boyle and Garland could also be utilizing Jim as a captivating facet of the collection’ rising mythology.
A story of a number of Jimmys
The opening sequence of “28 Years Later” takes place within the Scottish Highlands throughout the preliminary days of the outbreak of the craze virus in 2002. A younger boy named Jimmy (Rocco Haynes) is pressured to fend for survival on his personal as his mom and preacher father succumb to the Contaminated. We’re not initially informed the place that boy has ended up when the movie jumps ahead in time, 28 years later, however there is a sense that Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson), the daddy of the film’s protagonist, Spike (Alfie Williams), is perhaps the identical boy. In spite of everything, the names are comparable sufficient, and it is attainable that he might need grown up and easily wished to be known as a variation on his outdated title. The remoted island neighborhood that he lives in appears to have a robust non secular bent to it as properly, in order that acts as additional proof.
Issues get extra muddled as soon as Jamie and Spike make their option to the mainland for searching follow. A location or two that the daddy and son go by seems to have the title “Jimmy” scribbled on it, and the pair come throughout an deserted home with an contaminated man tied up and hanging the wrong way up with the title “Jim” carved onto his chest. Regardless that it is clear from the opening sequence that the boy named Jimmy is just not the identical individual as Murphy’s Jim from the primary movie and that his grownup counterpart will seem in some unspecified time in the future, these clues appear to trace that maybe Murphy’s Jim may nonetheless be on the market someplace elevating a ruckus.
All of that’s dispelled within the closing moments of “28 Years Later,” which introduces the grownup model of Jimmy (Jack O’Connell), as he and his cult-like gang of Contaminated hunters save Spike from sure dying. It is a bait and swap for a number of causes: it makes plain that Taylor-Johnson’s Jamie is just not the identical individual because the boy within the opening sequence and that O’Connell’s character is, in addition to gooses followers of the collection who have been anticipating (or simply hoping) that Murphy’s Jim may reappear.
The specter of Jim pervades over the world of ’28 Years Later’
Regardless of the ending of “28 Years Later” establishing this new Jimmy character (whom we’ll see extra of in director Nia DaCosta’s follow-up film “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple,” due in theaters subsequent January), the movie does not essentially dispel the concept of Murphy’s Jim making a comeback in some unspecified time in the future. Quite the opposite, it could be doing the alternative; if we’re together with Jamie, which means that we have not less than three JImmys within the combine inside this alternate Contaminated universe. This recurrence may merely be Garland and Boyle having fun, throwing a bunch of similarly-named males into comparable plights and seeing the variations between every.
Then once more, there is perhaps one thing probably deeper thematically at work right here. St. James the Nice, in keeping with the New Testomony, was the primary of the Apostles to be martyred, and given the heavy non secular themes to the “28” saga, I would not put it previous the filmmakers to make such a reference flippantly. In “28 Days Later,” Jim turns from a mere bicycle courier right into a type of avenging angel, a metamorphosis that is actually commented upon by Selena (Naomie Harris), pondering he might need develop into contaminated when he hasn’t. This notion of the craze virus apocalypse (which is just relegated to the UK and never the remainder of the world, it ought to be identified) being a catalyst for turning unusual people into mythic figures may be seen all through “28 Years Later,” from the way in which that Dr. Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) is spoken about as a Colonel Kurtz-like maniac solely to be revealed as a young mystic, to how Jimmy has usual his cult of tracksuit carrying zombie hunters after each the Teletubbies (this system he was watching earlier than the outbreak) and presenter Jimmy Savile, who was revealed to be a serial intercourse offender posthumously in 2012.
On this setting, it is solely attainable that Murphy’s Jim has additionally elevated (on his personal or by his influence) to the extent of a legendary determine, being the person who practically single-handedly took out a whole regiment of rogue troopers, in addition to contaminated. Although Murphy is just a producer on “28 Years Later” and doesn’t seem, evidently plans are within the works for he and Jim to make some type of comeback sooner or later. If and when that occurs, I would not be shocked if we get a Battle of the Jimmys or one thing. No matter occurs, I do not assume Boyle, Garland, DaCosta, and the opposite filmmakers might be denying us our Jim for an excessive amount of longer.
