Stewart Whitson, a senior director on the Basis for Authorities Accountability, testified earlier than Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s DOGE subcommittee in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 12. The listening to was titled “The Conflict on Waste.”
Al Drago/Getty Photographs
cover caption
toggle caption
Al Drago/Getty Photographs
PHOENIX — As an Arizona invoice to dam individuals from utilizing authorities support to purchase soda headed to the governor’s desk in April, the nation’s high well being official joined Arizona lawmakers within the state Capitol to have fun its passage.
Well being and Human Providers Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. stated to applause that the laws was simply the beginning and that he needed to forestall federal funding from paying for different unhealthy meals.
“We’re not going to try this in a single day,” Kennedy stated. “We’ll try this within the subsequent 4 years.”
These phrases of warning proved prescient when Arizona’s Democratic governor, Katie Hobbs, vetoed the invoice every week later. Nonetheless, state laws to limit what low-income individuals should buy utilizing Supplemental Vitamin Help Program advantages is gaining momentum, boosted by Kennedy’s touting it as a part of his “Make America Wholesome Once more” platform. No less than 14 states have thought of payments this yr with related SNAP restrictions on particular unhealthy meals comparable to sweet, with Idaho and Utah passing such laws as of mid-April.
Wholesome meals itself is not largely a partisan challenge, and those that research vitamin are inclined to agree that decreasing the quantity of sugary meals individuals eat is a good suggestion to keep away from well being penalties comparable to coronary heart illness. However the query over the federal government’s function in deciding who should buy what has develop into political.
The group largely behind SNAP restriction laws is the Basis for Authorities Accountability, a conservative coverage suppose tank in Florida, and its affiliated lobbying arm, which has used the identify Alternative Options Challenge.
FGA has labored for greater than a decade to reshape the nation’s public help packages. That features SNAP, previously referred to as meals stamps, which federal knowledge reveals helps a mean of 42 million individuals afford meals every month. It additionally advocates for tactics to chop Medicaid, the federal-state program that connects 71 million individuals to backed well being care, together with efforts in Idaho and Montana this yr.
FGA’s proposals typically search to restrict who faucets into that support and the assistance they obtain. These backing the group’s mission say the objective is to save lots of tax {dollars} and assist individuals elevate themselves out of poverty. Critics argue that FGA’s proposals are a backdoor strategy to lower off support to individuals who want it and that making wholesome meals and well being care extra inexpensive is a greater repair.
Now, FGA sees extra room for change underneath the Trump administration and the Kennedy-led well being division, calling 2025 a “window of alternative for main reform,” based on its newest annual report.
Because the Arizona veto reveals, alternative is not a assure of success, reflecting the FGA’s historical past of coverage hits and misses.
A imaginative and prescient for limiting authorities advantages
Tarren Bragdon, a former Maine legislator, based FGA in 2011 to advertise insurance policies to “free hundreds of thousands from authorities dependency and open the doorways for them to chase their very own American Dream,” he stated in a press release on FGA’s web site. The primary basis began out as a workers of three with about $60,000 within the financial institution. As of 2023, it had a funds of greater than $15 million and a crew of roughly 64, based on the most recent obtainable tax paperwork, and that is not counting the lobbying arm.
The inspiration acquired early funding from a grant from the State Coverage Community, which has lengthy backed right-leaning suppose tanks with ties to conservative activists together with brothers Charles and David Koch.
FGA declined a number of interview requests for this text.
Lately, the nonprofit helped draft a 2017 Mississippi regulation, the Jackson Free Press discovered, which intensified eligibility checks for public support that made it harder for some candidates to qualify. It efficiently pushed a 2023 effort in Idaho to impose work necessities for meals advantages that well being care advocates stated led some recipients to lose entry.
The identical yr, the group helped move SNAP restrictions affecting eligibility in Iowa. Since these restrictions have taken impact, the Meals Financial institution of Iowa has seen a document variety of individuals present up at its pantries amid rising grocery costs and a scaling again of COVID pandemic-era federal help, stated Annette Hacker, a vp on the nonprofit.
A part of the group’s technique is to move laws state by state, with the concept that the crush of recent legal guidelines will improve strain on the federal authorities. For instance, states cannot restrict what meals is bought via SNAP with out federal approval via a waiver course of. And up to now, a few of FGA’s efforts have stalled as a result of states by no means acquired that approval.
U.S. Well being Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. excursions a meals financial institution in Mesa, Ariz., on April 8, 2025. Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs vetoed a regulation backed by Kennedy and FGA to maintain SNAP advantages from being spent on soda.
Ross D. Franklin/AP
cover caption
toggle caption
Ross D. Franklin/AP
Kennedy’s agenda now echoes a few of FGA’s key messages, and he has stated states can count on approval of their waivers. In the meantime, congressional leaders are eyeing nationwide Medicaid cuts and work necessities, which FGA considers amongst its main points. The inspiration additionally has a connection working contained in the administration: Its former coverage director, Sam Adolphsen, was tapped to advise President Donald Trump on home issues.
“We’re excited to struggle from Topeka to Washington, D.C., versus Washington, D.C., to Topeka,” Roy Lenardson, FGA’s state authorities affairs director, informed Kansas lawmakers in February when testifying in help of SNAP laws there.
Shaping state insurance policies
Within the states, FGA has develop into referred to as a conservative “thought chief,” stated Brian Colby, vp of public coverage for Missouri Finances Challenge, a progressive nonprofit that gives evaluation of state coverage points.
“Conservatives used to attempt to chop away on the federal funds,” Colby stated. “These guys are doing it on the state degree.”
In its 14 years, FGA has created a playbook to form state coverage discussions about public advantages behind the scenes. In Montana, retired Republican state legislator Cary Smith, who labored with FGA, stated not all the suppose tank’s concepts cut up alongside occasion strains.
“They provide a buffet of choices,” he stated. “Their agenda is making authorities accountable; it is within the identify.”
He stated in addition to drafting laws, FGA supplies speaking factors and knowledge to assist policymakers help their arguments.
“They’d go in and would say, ‘That is what Medicaid fraud is costing us,'” Smith stated. “That may be the quantity you’d need to use in your invoice.”
In January, FGA launched a memo for states to “cease taxpayer-funded junk meals.” In February, Stateline reported that Wyoming Republican state Rep. Jacob Wasserburger stated the group requested him to sponsor a SNAP restriction invoice. The state sponsor of comparable laws in Missouri has repeated not less than considered one of FGA’s speaking factors, as reported by the Missouri Impartial. In Arizona, Republican Rep. Leo Biasiucci, who sponsored the SNAP laws there, informed KFF Well being Information FGA was behind that invoice as properly.
Opponents of such payments argue the proposals usually are not so simple as they sound. Amid debate on a SNAP invoice in Montana, Kiera Condon, with the Montana Meals Financial institution Community, testified that the laws would pressure grocery retailer staff to type via what counts as soda or sweet, “which may end in retailers not collaborating in SNAP in any respect.” State lawmakers tabled the Montana invoice in April.
Montana legislators additionally simply handed a invoice to increase the state’s Medicaid enlargement program even after FGA started publishing a sequence of papers that asserted this system was “breaking” Montana’s funds. FGA had offered knowledge saying most Montanans on this system do not work, which state knowledge refutes.
Ed Bolen, who leads meals support methods on the left-leaning Middle on Finances and Coverage Priorities suppose tank, stated FGA has a sample of proposing technical modifications to current legal guidelines and “unworkable work necessities” that trigger individuals to lose advantages.
The Kansas instance
After working with policymakers in Kansas for a decade, FGA helped move laws that restricted how lengthy individuals can entry money help, added work necessities to SNAP, and banned the state from spending federal or state funds to advertise public support. A lot of these modifications got here via 2015 laws referred to as the “HOPE Act” drafted by FGA, The Washington Publish reported.
Evaluation from Kansas Appleseed, an advocacy group for low-income Kansans, discovered the SNAP caseload sharply declined after the invoice was enacted due to the brand new hurdles, dropping from 140,000 households in January 2014 to 90,000 as of January 2020.
“It is loss of life by a thousand cuts,” stated Karen Siebert, an adviser for Harvesters, a neighborhood meals financial institution community in Kansas and Missouri. “A few of these FGA proposals are such complicated insurance policies, it is exhausting to argue towards and to elucidate the ripple results.”
In 2024, the muse produced greater than two dozen movies that includes state politicians from throughout the nation touting the group’s targets and dozens of analysis papers arguing public advantages are wrecking state budgets. FGA additionally has its personal polling crew to supply knowledge out of the states it is working to affect.
The group launched a listing of 14 states it labeled as “redder and higher” locations to exert extra affect. That included Idaho, the place the group has 4 registered lobbyists within the state Capitol.
In 2023, FGA helped current and efficiently foyer for laws there to require individuals receiving meals support to work not less than 80 hours a month. The group known as the ensuing regulation “landmark welfare reform” years within the making.
And this yr, Idaho lawmakers handed extra necessities for individuals enrolled in Medicaid who can work. FGA staffers labored with one of many co-sponsors of the laws on the same invoice final yr that failed, then once more this yr. A compromise invoice handed with FGA’s backing, marking one other victory for the muse.
David Lehman, a lobbyist for the Idaho Affiliation of Neighborhood Suppliers, which represents well being organizations which have opposed FGA payments, stated Idaho illustrates how FGA works with sympathetic lawmakers in conservative states to achieve extra floor.
“They’re pushing an already rolling rock downhill,” he stated.
KFF Well being Information is a nationwide newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about well being points and is among the core working packages at Kff — the impartial supply for well being coverage analysis, polling, and journalism.
