Image this: It is 2025. Your advertising and marketing intern used an AI instrument to generate content material on your greatest shopper and unintentionally included hallucinated product options and hit ship earlier than anybody may evaluate it.
Gave you a chill, didn’t it?
Because the creator financial system races to undertake generative AI instruments, taking a pause to construct a correct content material governance ought to be the next move.
Fortunate for us, the writer of “What Issues Subsequent” and the founder and CEO of KO Insights, Kate O’Neill, shared her knowledge on navigating the wild west of AI-powered content material creation earlier than your group faces its personal content material disaster.
This interview is a part of G2’s Q&A collection. For extra content material like this, subscribe to G2 Tea, a e-newsletter with SaaS-y information and leisure.
To look at the complete interview, try the video beneath:
Contained in the trade with Kate O’Neill
Your newest ebook, “What Issues Subsequent,” addresses future-ready decision-making. Are you able to inform us how this is applicable particularly to content material threat administration?
I feel future-ready choice making is an idea or a mindset that entails a steadiness between enterprise aims and human values. This performs out in tech as a result of the size and scope of tech choice making is so enormous. And quite a lot of leaders really feel daunted by how complicated the choice making is.
Inside content material threat administration, what we’re is a necessity for governance and a type of coverage to be put in place. We’re additionally a proactive strategy that is past simply regulatory compliance.
The secret is understanding what issues in your present actuality whereas anticipating what can be necessary sooner or later, all guided by a transparent understanding of what your group is attempting to perform and what defines your values.
I feel the concentrate on creating strong inner frameworks will actually profit folks relating to content material threat. And people frameworks ought to be based mostly on function and organizational values. It is extremely necessary to have a very clear understanding of what it’s the group is attempting to perform and what it’s that defines their values.
Rework your AI advertising and marketing technique.
Be part of trade leaders at G2’s free AI in Motion Roadshow for actionable insights and confirmed methods to reimagine your funnel. Register now
Speaking about content material dangers, what are essentially the most important hidden dangers in content material methods that organizations usually overlook, and the way can they be extra aware sooner or later?
Once I labored for a big enterprise on the intranet group, our focus was not simply on content material dissemination but in addition on sustaining content material integrity, managing rules, and stopping duplication. For instance, totally different departments typically stored their very own copies of paperwork, just like the code of conduct. Nonetheless, updating these paperwork may result in inconsistent variations throughout departments, leading to “orphaned” or outdated content material.
One other traditional instance that I’ve seen so many occasions is a few sort of work course of getting instantiated after which codified into documentation. However that doc represents one particular person’s quirky preferences, which grow to be ingrained in documentation even after that particular person leaves. This results in sustaining non-essential data with out a clear motive. And so I feel these are the sorts of issues which might be very low-key sort of dangers. These are low-harm dangers, though they add up over time.
What we’re seeing within the higher-risk stakes is just not having readability or transparency throughout communications and never having the ability to perceive which stakeholders are accountable for various items of content material.
Additionally, with generative AI getting used inside organizations, we see lots of people producing their very own variations of content material after which sending that out on behalf of the corporate to shoppers or to outside-facing media organizations. And people aren’t essentially sanctioned by the stakeholders throughout the group who wish to have some sort of governance over documentation.
A complete content material technique that addresses these points at regulatory, compliance, and enterprise engagement ranges would go a good distance towards mitigating these dangers.
With content material methods changing into international, how regulatory variations throughout international markets have sophisticated content material threat administration, significantly with the emergence of generative AI. What particular compliance points ought to organizations be most involved about?
We see this so much in lots of fields of AI. We’re seeing how generative AI, significantly due to its widespread use, is clashing with international rules. Particularly in areas just like the U.S., the place deregulation is outstanding, corporations face challenges in establishing efficient inner governance frameworks. Such inner governance frameworks are essential to make sure their resilience in international markets and to forestall points just like the dissemination of unrepresentative content material that would misalign with an organization’s values or positions, doubtlessly compromising security and safety.
We’d like to consider resilience and future readiness from an organization management standpoint. And which means having the ability to say, “We’d like the very best sort of procedures for us, for our group.” And that is most likely going to imply being adaptable to any market. If you happen to do enterprise globally, it’s essential be ready on your content material to be consumed or engaged with by international markets.
“I feel specializing in creating worth pushed frameworks that transcend particular rules is the proper method to go.”
Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights
We have to suppose proactively about governance in order that we will create the sort of aggressive benefit and resilience that can assist us navigate international markets and altering circumstances. As a result of as quickly as any specific authorities modifications to a special chief, we might even see full fluctuation in these regulatory states.
So, by specializing in long-term methods, corporations can shield their content material, folks, and stakeholders and keep ready for shifts in governmental insurance policies and international market dynamics.
I see that you just’re very energetic on LinkedIn, and also you discuss AI capabilities and human values intertwining. So, contemplating the steadiness between AI capabilities and human values, what framework do you suggest for making certain that AI-powered content material instruments align with human-centric values and never vice versa?
Opposite to the assumption that human-centric or values-driven frameworks stifle innovation, I imagine they really improve it. When you perceive what your group is attempting to perform and the way it advantages each inner and exterior stakeholders, innovation turns into simpler inside these well-defined guardrails.
I like to recommend utilizing the “now-next continuum” framework from my ebook “What Issues Subsequent.” This entails figuring out your priorities now, partaking in situation planning about probably future outcomes, defining your most popular outcomes, and dealing on closing the hole between probably outcomes and most popular outcomes.
This train, utilized by way of a human-centric lens, is definitely the very best factor I can consider to facilitate innovation as a result of it actually permits you to transfer rapidly but in addition lets you understand that you just’re not transferring so rapidly that you just’re harming folks. It creates a steadiness between technological functionality and moral duty that advantages each the enterprise and the people linked to it.
“Take into consideration the steadiness between technological functionality and moral duty and do this in a means that advantages the enterprise and the people which might be in and outdoors of the enterprise on the identical time.”
Kate O’Neill
Founder and CEO of KO Insights
Trying forward, what expertise ought to content material groups develop now to be ready for future content material dangers?
Content material groups ought to concentrate on creating expertise that mix technical understanding with moral concerns till this integration turns into second nature. The opposite factor must be proactive management and actually fascinated with how there’s quite a lot of uncertainty due to geopolitics, local weather, AI, and different quite a few matters.
And given the uncertainty of this time, I feel there is a tendency to really feel very caught. As a substitute, that is truly the very best time to look forward and do the integrative work of understanding what issues now and what is going to matter sooner or later — from one yr to 100 years forward.
The secret is pulling these future concerns into your present selections, actions, and priorities. This forward-looking integration is the essence of “What Issues Subsequent” and represents the abilities many individuals want proper now.
If you happen to loved this insightful dialog, subscribe to G2 Tea for the newest tech and advertising and marketing thought management.
Observe Kate O’Neill on LinkedIn to know extra about AI ethics, content material governance and accountable tech.
Edited by SUPANNA DAS
