The concept of a “bathtub time tax” may sound like one thing out of a dystopian novel, nevertheless it’s grow to be a sizzling subject within the UK’s ongoing water debate.
Whereas it is not a direct tax in your bubbles, this controversial concept factors to new plans aimed toward encouraging us to save lots of water and pay in a different way.
We dive into the truth of rising water payments and uncover if a much bigger splash actually means a much bigger invoice.
‘Progressive’ water tariffs and sensible meters
On the coronary heart of the controversy are proposals from water corporations to implement “progressive” pricing fashions.
Which means the extra water a family makes use of, the upper the speed per litre they’d pay. This shift is being advocated as a option to encourage water conservation, particularly within the face of rising considerations over water shortage, exacerbated by latest dry springs and droughts.
Water Minister Emma Hardy has publicly acknowledged assist for “progressive approaches being taken to trial new prices aiming to make payments fairer and extra reasonably priced.”
To allow such a system, a widespread rollout of sensible water meters can be essential. These meters would permit for real-time monitoring of water consumption, offering the information wanted to use tiered tariffs.
Deliver your dream residence to life with knowledgeable recommendation, guides and design inspiration. Join our e-newsletter and get two free tickets to a Homebuilding & Renovating Present close to you.
At present, solely about 12% of English properties have sensible water meters, in comparison with 60% with normal meters.
Who could possibly be affected and why?
The Conservative celebration, significantly Shadow Secretary Levelling Up Secretary Kevin Hollirake, criticised these proposals, branding them a “tax on bathtub time” and “class conflict in motion.”
They argue that sure households and households can be disproportionately affected, similar to:
- Households with youngsters: Every day actions like bathing babies, washing garments and normal family cleansing naturally result in larger water consumption.
- Properties with gardens or swimming swimming pools: Watering gardens, filling paddling swimming pools, or sustaining swimming swimming pools would incur larger prices beneath a progressive tariff.
- Bigger households: Extra occupants usually imply extra water utilization, resulting in larger payments.
The Conservative Get together declare it is a “conflict on household properties” and accused Labour of backing a “socialist-inspired” coverage that would penalise mother and father for routine actions.
Nevertheless, a Labour spokesperson referred to as these claims “absolute garbage”.
The water corporations’ perspective
Water corporations, largely by way of their consultant physique Water UK, however, argue that progressive tariffs would:
- Encourage water effectivity: By making larger utilization dearer, it could incentivise households to scale back their consumption, contributing to nationwide water conservation efforts.
- Doubtlessly decrease payments for many: Firms like Thames Water declare it might cut back water payments by 9% for three-quarters of consumers.
- Fund important infrastructure: The broader context of rising water payments within the UK is an enormous £96 billion funding plan over the subsequent 5 years to improve infrastructure, cut back air pollution, and safe long-term ingesting water provides.
Present water invoice will increase
No matter whether or not progressive tariffs are broadly adopted, water payments are already set to extend considerably.
The nationwide common water invoice is forecast to rise to £603 a 12 months from April 1st, 2025, a rise of over £10 a month for a typical family. This rise is primarily pushed by the aforementioned infrastructure funding and efforts to handle points like sewage spills.
Ofwat, the unbiased regulator, has authorized substantial funding and is working to make sure that payments are honest whereas holding corporations accountable for delivering enhancements.
They’ve additionally acknowledged that they are going to use their powers to stop clients’ cash from getting used for undeserved govt bonuses.
Labour ministers have indicated openness to trialling these progressive tariff techniques, with Ofwat overseeing any trials to make sure honest prices.
Whereas a direct “bathtub time tax” in title may not materialise, the proposed shifts in water charging mechanisms, coupled with the continued rise in general water payments, imply that how and the way a lot we pay for water within the UK is actually set to vary, with potential impacts on each family’s funds.
